Hey Warhawk,
That's a good question. Kinda a matter of preference. However, I would have to assume that if both rounds fit in the same size of gun, people would prefer the larger round. That being said, I have carried both. The thing about the tiny guns, they are pretty much a close range, defensive pistol. The things are by no means range guns..
I tried the Kel-Tec P32s and a P3AT. I could usually hit a man size target with them at combat ranges, but that was it. Doesn't help that they are DA only. But you can sure hide them well, even in shorts. Very light too.
Largest ones I tried were the Kel-Tec P-11 and Tauruss Millenium, first model. Both were 9 mm of course and a much larger, but had a good capacity of 10 or more rounds. Decided they were a bit thick and heavy, so I tried the smaller ones in .32 and .380 later.
The Bersa Thunder .380 is a good one. It has the external hammer, dec0cker, DA/SA trigger and a longer barrel. Makes a decent range gun also. It is however heavy and a single stack. I used one for a coupel of years and then went to the Ruger LC9. Ligher again, but DA only. So the accuracy level is again limited to combat ranges for me anyway. Someone else may shot it better at longer distances, but I have the 9 mil and it is now made in .360. My buddy has the smaller Ruger LCP .380 which he carries all the time. It is much the same as the Kel-Tecs.
So most of the time now, I carry the LC9, but it can be a bit heavy in light shorts. So, I got another tiny .32 by chance in s swap. It is a Taurus TCP .32, DA only and much the same as the Kel-Tecs in size also. Now that it is getting hot in south Texas, I am in shorts again. So, the little TCP is in my pocket all the time. I would rather have the .380 cal model PT-738, but I am into this gun for less than nothing and it works great for an up close and personal gun. Well, really no worse than the Kel-Texs or Rugers. in the same size gun.
That's a good question. Kinda a matter of preference. However, I would have to assume that if both rounds fit in the same size of gun, people would prefer the larger round. That being said, I have carried both. The thing about the tiny guns, they are pretty much a close range, defensive pistol. The things are by no means range guns..
I tried the Kel-Tec P32s and a P3AT. I could usually hit a man size target with them at combat ranges, but that was it. Doesn't help that they are DA only. But you can sure hide them well, even in shorts. Very light too.
Largest ones I tried were the Kel-Tec P-11 and Tauruss Millenium, first model. Both were 9 mm of course and a much larger, but had a good capacity of 10 or more rounds. Decided they were a bit thick and heavy, so I tried the smaller ones in .32 and .380 later.
The Bersa Thunder .380 is a good one. It has the external hammer, dec0cker, DA/SA trigger and a longer barrel. Makes a decent range gun also. It is however heavy and a single stack. I used one for a coupel of years and then went to the Ruger LC9. Ligher again, but DA only. So the accuracy level is again limited to combat ranges for me anyway. Someone else may shot it better at longer distances, but I have the 9 mil and it is now made in .360. My buddy has the smaller Ruger LCP .380 which he carries all the time. It is much the same as the Kel-Tecs.
So most of the time now, I carry the LC9, but it can be a bit heavy in light shorts. So, I got another tiny .32 by chance in s swap. It is a Taurus TCP .32, DA only and much the same as the Kel-Tecs in size also. Now that it is getting hot in south Texas, I am in shorts again. So, the little TCP is in my pocket all the time. I would rather have the .380 cal model PT-738, but I am into this gun for less than nothing and it works great for an up close and personal gun. Well, really no worse than the Kel-Texs or Rugers. in the same size gun.
